|
|
|
Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) 29
Auditing in a Computer Information
Systems Environment |
|
The following is the text of the Auditing and
Assurance Standard (AAS) 29, "Auditing in a Computer Information
Systems Environment" issued by the Council of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India
1.
This Standard should be read in conjunction with the "Preface to the
Statements on Standard Auditing Practices" issued by the Institute.
2 |
|
Introduction |
|
1. |
The purpose of this Auditing and Assurance Standard
(AAS) is to establish standards on procedures to be followed when an
audit is conducted in a computer information systems (CIS)
environment. For the purposes of this AAS, a CIS environment exists
when one or more computer(s) of any type or size is (are) involved in
the processing of financial information, including quantitative data,
of significance to the audit, whether those computers are operated by
the entity or by a third party. |
|
2. |
The overall objective and scope of an audit does
not change in a CIS environment. However, the use of a computer
changes the processing, storage, retrieval and communication of
financial information and may affect the accounting and internal
control systems employed by the entity. Accordingly, a CIS environment
may affect:
-
the procedures followed by the auditor in
obtaining a sufficient understanding of the accounting and internal
control system.
-
the auditor's evaluation of inherent risk and
control risk through which the auditor assesses the audit risk.
-
the auditor's design and performance of tests of
control and substantive procedures appropriate to meet the audit
objective.
|
|
3. |
The auditor should consider the effect of a CIS
environment on the audit. The auditor should evaluate, inter alia,
the following factors to determine the effect of CIS environment on
the audit:
-
the extent to which the CIS environment is used
to record, compile and analyse accounting information;
-
the system of internal control in existence in
the entity with regard to:
-
flow of authorised, correct and complete data
to the processing center;
-
processing, analysis and reporting tasks
undertaken in the installation; and
-
the impact of computer-based accounting system on
the audit trail that could otherwise be expected to exist in an
entirely manual system.
|
|
Skills and Competence |
|
4. |
The auditor should have sufficient knowledge of
the computer information systems to plan, direct, supervise, control
and review the work performed. The sufficiency of knowledge would
depend on the nature and extent of the CIS environment. The auditor
should consider whether any specialised CIS skills are needed in the
conduct of the audit. Specialised skills may be needed, inter
alia, to:
-
obtain sufficient understanding of the effect of
the CIS environment on accounting and internal control systems;
-
determine the effect of the CIS environment on
the assessment of overall audit risk and of risk at the account
balance and class of transactions level; and
-
design and perform appropriate tests of control
and substantive procedures.
If specialised skills are needed, the auditor would
seek the assistance of an expert possessing such skills, who may
either be the auditor's staff or an outside professional. If the
use of such a professional is planned, the auditor should, in
accordance with AAS 9, "Using the Work of an Expert", obtain
sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the work performed by the
expert is adequate for the purposes of the audit. |
|
Planning |
|
5. |
In accordance with the Auditing and Assurance
Standard (AAS) 6 (Revised), "Risk Assessments and Internal Control",
the auditor should obtain an understanding of the accounting and
internal control systems sufficient to plan the audit and to determine
the nature, timing and extent of the audit procedures. Such an
understanding would help the auditor to develop an effective audit
approach. |
|
6. |
In planning the portions of the audit which may
be affected by the CIS environment, the auditor should obtain an
understanding of the significance and complexity of the CIS activities
and the availability of the data for use in the audit. This
understanding would include such matters as:
-
the computer information systems infrastructure
[hardware, operating system(s), etc., and application software(s)
used by the entity, including changes, if any, therein since last
audit].
-
the significance and complexity of computerised
processing in each significant accounting application. Significance
relates to materiality of the financial statement assertions
affected by the computerised processing. An application may be
considered to be complex when, for example:
-
the volume of transactions is such that users
would find it difficult to identify and correct errors in
processing.
-
the computer automatically generates material
transactions or entries directly to another application.
-
the computer performs complicated computations
of financial information and/or automatically generates material
transactions or entries that cannot be (or are not) validated
independently.
-
transactions are exchanged electronically with
other organisations [as in electronic data interchange (EDI)
systems] without manual review for propriety or reasonableness.
-
determination of the organisational structure of
the client's CIS activities and the extent of concentration or
distribution of computer processing throughout the entity,
particularly, as they may affect segregation of duties.
-
determination of the availability of data. Source
documents, computer files, and other evidential matter that may be
required by the auditor may exist for only a short period or only in
machine-readable form. Computer information systems may generate
reports that might be useful in performing substantive tests
(particularly analytical procedures). The potential for use of
computer-assisted audit techniques may permit increased efficiency
in the performance of audit procedures, or may enable the auditor to
economically apply certain procedures to the entire population of
accounts or transactions.
|
|
7. |
When the computer information systems are
significant, the auditor should also obtain an understanding of the
CIS environment and whether it may influence the assessment of
inherent and control risks. The nature of the risks and the
internal control characteristics in CIS environments include the
following:
-
Lack of transaction trails : Some computer
information systems are designed so that a complete transaction
trail that is useful for audit purposes might exist for only a short
period of time or only in computer readable form. Where a complex
application system performs a large number of processing steps,
there may not be a complete trail. Accordingly, errors embedded in
an application's program logic may be difficult to detect on a
timely basis by manual (user) procedures.
-
Uniform processing of transactions:
Computer processing uniformly processes like transactions with the
same processing instructions. Thus, the clerical errors ordinarily
associated with manual processing are virtually eliminated.
Conversely, programming errors (or other systemic errors in hardware
or software) will ordinarily result in all transactions being
processed incorrectly.
-
Lack of segregation of functions: Many
control procedures that would ordinarily be performed by separate
individuals in manual systems may become concentrated in a CIS
environment. Thus, an individual who has access to computer
programs, processing or data may be in a position to perform
incompatible functions.
-
Potential for errors and irregularities :
The potential for human error in the development, maintenance and
execution of computer information systems may be greater than in
manual systems, partially because of the level of detail inherent in
these activities. Also, the potential for individuals to gain
unauthorised access to data or to alter data without visible
evidence may be greater in CIS than in manual systems.
In addition, decreased human involvement in handling transactions
processed by computer information systems can reduce the potential
for observing errors and irregularities. Errors or irregularities
occurring during the design or modification of application programs
or systems software can remain undetected for long periods of time.
-
Initiation or execution of transactions:
Computer information systems may include the capability to initiate
or cause the execution of certain types of transactions,
automatically. The authorisation of these transactions or procedures
may not be documented in the same way as that in a manual system,
and management's authorisation of these transactions may be implicit
in its acceptance of the design of the computer information systems
and subsequent modification.
-
Dependence of other controls over computer
processing: Computer processing may produce reports and other
output that are used in performing manual control procedures. The
effectiveness of these manual control procedures can be dependent on
the effectiveness of controls over the completeness and accuracy of
computer processing. In turn, the effectiveness and consistent
operation of transaction processing controls in computer
applications is often dependent on the effectiveness of general
computer information systems controls.
-
Potential for increased management
supervision: Computer information systems can offer management a
variety of analytical tools that may be used to review and supervise
the operations of the entity. The availability of these analytical
tools, if used, may serve to enhance the entire internal control
structure.
-
Potential for the use of computer-assisted
audit techniques: The case of processing and analysing large
quantities of data using computers may require the auditor to apply
general or specialised computer audit techniques and tools in the
execution of audit tests.
Both the risks and the controls introduced as a
result of these characteristics of computer information systems have a
potential impact on the auditor's assessment of risk, and the nature,
timing and extent of audit procedures. |
|
8. |
While evaluating the reliability of the accounting
and internal control systems, the auditor would consider whether these
systems, inter alia:
-
ensure that authorised, correct and complete data
is made available for processing;
-
provide for timely detection and correction of
errors;
-
ensure that in case of interruption in the
working of the CIS environment due to power, mechanical or
processing failures, the system restarts without distorting the
completion of the entries and records;
-
ensure the accuracy and completeness of output;
-
provide adequate data security against fire and
other calamities, wrong processing, frauds etc.;
-
prevent unauthorised amendments to the programs;
and
-
provide for safe custody of source code of
application software and data files.
|
|
Assessment of Risk |
|
9. |
The auditor should make an assessment of
inherent and control risks for material financial statement
assertions, in accordance with AAS 6 (Revised), "Risk Assessments and
Internal Control". |
|
10. |
The inherent risks and control risks in a CIS
environment may have both a pervasive effect and an account-specific
effect on the likelihood of material misstatements, as follows:
-
The risks may result from deficiencies in
pervasive CIS activities such as program development and
maintenance, system software support, operations, physical CIS
security, and control over access to special-privilege utility
programs. These deficiencies would tend to have a pervasive impact
on all application systems that are processed on the computer.
-
The risks may increase the potential for errors
or fraudulent activities in specific applications, in specific
databases or master files, or in specific processing activities. For
example, errors are not uncommon in systems that perform complex
logic or calculations, or that must deal with many different
exception conditions. Systems that control cash disbursements or
other liquid assets are susceptible to fraudulent actions by users
or by CIS personnel.
|
|
11. |
As new CIS technologies emerge for data processing,
they are frequently employed by clients to build increasingly complex
computer systems that may include micro-to-mainframe links,
distributed data bases, end-user processing, and business management
systems that feed information directly into the accounting systems.
Such systems increase the overall sophistication of computer
information systems and the complexity of the specific applications
that they affect. As a result, they may increase risk and require
further consideration. |
|
Audit Procedures |
|
12. |
In accordance with AAS 6 (Revised) "Risk
Assessments and Internal Control", the auditor should consider the CIS
environment in designing audit procedures to reduce audit risk to an
acceptably low level. He should make enquiries and particularly
satisfy himself whether:
-
adequate procedures exist to ensure that the data
transmitted is correct and complete; and
-
cross-verification of records, reconciliation
statements and control systems between primary and subsidiary
ledgers do exist and are operative and that accuracy of computer
compiled records are not assumed.
|
|
13. |
The auditor's specific audit objectives do not
change whether accounting data is processed manually or by computer.
However, the methods of applying audit procedures to gather evidence
may be influenced by the methods of computer processing. The auditor
can use manual audit procedures, or computer-assisted audit
techniques, or a combination of both to obtain sufficient evidential
matter. However, in some accounting systems that use a computer for
processing significant applications, it may be difficult or impossible
for the auditor to obtain certain data for inspection, inquiry, or
confirmation without computer assistance. |
|
Documentation |
|
14. |
The auditor should document the audit plan, the
nature, timing and extent of audit procedures performed and the
conclusions drawn from the evidence obtained. In an audit in CIS
environment, some of the audit evidence may be in the electronic form.
The auditor should satisfy himself that such evidence is adequately
and safely stored and is retrievable in its entirety as and when
required. |
|
Effective Date |
|
15. |
This Auditing and Assurance Standard (AAS) becomes
operative for all audits related to accounting periods beginning on or
after 1st April, 2003. |
|
Compatibility with International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 401 |
|
The auditing standards established in this Auditing
and Assurance Standard are generally consistent in all material
respects with those set out in International Standard on Auditing
(ISA) 401 on Auditing in a Computer Information Systems Environment
except for the additional requirement related to "Documentation" [see
paragraph 14]. ISA 401 does not contain any requirement related to
documentation. |
1Issued in January 2003.
2 With the formation of the Auditing Practices Committee
{now known as the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board} in 1982, the
Council of the Institute has been issuing a series of Statements on
Standard Auditing Practices (SAPs). SAPs have been renamed as Auditing
and Assurance Standards (AASs). Auditing an d Assurance Standards
(hitherto SAPs) lay down the principles governing an audit. These
principles apply whenever an independent audit is carried out.
Auditing and Assurance Standards become mandatory on the dates
specified in the respective AAS. Their mandatory status implies that,
while discharging their attest function, it will be the duty of the
members of the Institute to ensure that the AASs are followed in the
audit of financial information covered by their audit reports. If, for
any reason, a member has not been able to perform an audit in
accordance with the AASs, his report should draw attention to the
material departures therefrom. The Auditing and Assurance Standards
have the same authority as that attached to the Statements on Standard
Auditing Practices. |
|
|